Contenu éditorial de confiance, examiné par des experts de l'industrie de premier plan et des éditeurs expérimentés. Divulgation publicitaire
July 2025. The symbolic milestone of $120,000 has been crossed by Bitcoin, bringing with it a renewed euphoria in the markets. Bitcoin spot ETFs, driven by the largest asset managers, are capturing massive inflows.
Meanwhile, another path emerges, more underground, more radical: that of Bitcoin Hyper, a project that diverts the codes of memecoins to offer an enhanced version of Bitcoin. Two options, two philosophies. Should we stay on the side of Bitcoin ETFs, or bet on the audacity of Bitcoin Hyper? That is the question we are asking today.
L’essor des ETF Bitcoin : simplicité et institutionnalisation
It only took eighteen months for Bitcoin ETFs to become the norm. Even in 2023, holding BTC involved managing a wallet, securing private keys, and tracking fluctuations in network fees. Today, everything is done through a securities account. In just a few clicks, any individual can buy shares backed by real Bitcoin, held by secure custodians.
This approach is appealing. It is simple, smooth, compatible with traditional tax frameworks, and allows cautious investors to expose themselves without getting their hands dirty. The gap between the ETF price and that of Bitcoin is often negligible. Volumes are significant, liquidity is present. On the surface, everything seems under control.
But this simplicity has a downside. The ETF is not Bitcoin. It is a derivative product, a substitute. It does not provide access to the ecosystem, does not allow participation in the network, nor interaction with the emerging innovations. By opting for the Bitcoin ETF, one agrees to be a spectator. See also: Altcoin season.
Bitcoin Hyper : une tentative de réappropriation technique et narrative
In the face of this wave of institutionalization, some resist. And it is in this context that Bitcoin Hyper is situated. This project, still in the successful presale phase (, shakes up the benchmarks. It presents itself as a Layer 2 for Bitcoin, designed to add a layer of speed, programmability, and connectivity. Except that it does so with an assumed insolence, at the crossroads of technical diversion and cultural satire.
Specifically, Bitcoin Hyper is based on the Solana Virtual Machine. This technological choice allows it to benefit from an ultra-fast infrastructure while building bridges with the Bitcoin ecosystem. The goal is clear: to inject DeFi, staking, and smart contracts into a historically closed universe.
But beyond engineering, it is the positioning that stands out. Bitcoin Hyper presents itself as a serious memecoin, or a mocking protocol. It plays with the codes, without ever falling into gratuitous absurdity. It diverts to better build. And perhaps this is its greatest strength: this ability to create adherence without giving up ambiguity.
) Participez à la prévente de Bitcoin Hyper !
Comparatif : deux stratégies d’investissement, deux natures d’actifs
Here is a comparison between these two opposing approaches:
| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Critère | ETF Bitcoin ###IBIT, FBTC…( | Bitcoin Hyper )HYPER( |
| Nature de l’actif | Produit financier adossé à du BTC | Token natif d’un Layer 2 encore en presale |
| Accès | Compte-titres, interface traditionnelle | Wallet crypto, interaction on-chain |
| Frais | Gestion annuelle | Aucun frais mais fort risque spéculatif |
| Function | Passive exposure to BTC price | Active utility in an ecosystem |
| Horizon | Long terme sécurisé | Court/moyen terme spéculatif |
| Potential for gain | Aligned with BTC | Strong multiplier in case of success |
The contrast is clear. While the ETF offers you a fixed position, Bitcoin Hyper offers you participation. One seeks to protect you, the other to activate you. One follows, the other tries to create. It all depends on what you expect from your investment.
ETF Bitcoin pour qui ? Adapter son choix à son profil
We believe that this debate does not call for a single answer. The choice between Bitcoin ETF and Bitcoin Hyper primarily depends on your stance. If you are looking for stability, compliance, and long-term visibility, the ETF remains a coherent solution. It ticks the classic boxes for asset allocation: regulation, liquidity, tax clarity.
But if you are one of those who invest to experiment, to take chances, to capture asymmetry, then Bitcoin Hyper deserves your full attention. Because it is not just a speculative bet. It is also a narrative proposition. It involves you. It forces you to choose a side.
Some will combine the two. A solid base via ETF, and a bolder line on HYPER. Others will opt for a single horse. Whatever your decision, it will say a lot about your relationship with the market.
) ETF Bitcoin et Bitcoin HYPER : ni l’un ni l’autre n’est sans risque
We said it: Bitcoin ETFs are not neutral. Their dependence on centralized managers, their potential exposure to regulatory restrictions, and their total lack of interaction with the network are structural limits. They are easy, but they are silent.
As for Bitcoin Hyper, everything is to be built. The project relies on precise execution: finalization of the presale, launch of cross-chain bridges, maintaining the staking level, listings on exchanges… A delay or a flaw could jeopardize everything. Not to mention the liquidity risk at the time of launch.
C’est pourquoi nous insistons : parier sur Bitcoin Hyper, c’est accepter un haut niveau d’incertitude. Mais c’est aussi revendiquer une forme d’engagement. Celui de croire qu’une autre couche est possible. Qu’un Bitcoin plus vivant, plus interactif, plus narratif peut émerger.
Comment choisir entre ETF Bitcoin et Bitcoin Hyper ?
Nous pensons que Bitcoin Hyper est plus qu’un simple token en presale. C’est une tentative, peut-être maladroite, peut-être brillante, de répondre à l’institutionnalisation croissante de Bitcoin. Là où les ETF canalisent, $HYPER déborde. Là où les ETF filtrent, HYPER provoque.
Choosing between these two paths is choosing between observation and participation. Between comfort and boldness. It is not a technical opposition. It is a divergence of trajectory.
And in 2025, as the crypto market normalizes rapidly, this question, to participate or to delegate, becomes more central than ever. It's up to each person to answer it according to their beliefs.
Join the presale of Bitcoin Hyper!
![]###https://bitcoinist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/safe.png(
Le processus éditorial de bitcoinist est axé sur la fourniture de contenu soigneusement recherché, précis et impartial. Nous maintenons des normes de sourcing strictes, et chaque page subit un examen diligent par notre équipe de meilleurs experts en technologie et d'éditeurs expérimentés. Ce processus garantit l'intégrité, la pertinence et la valeur de notre contenu pour nos lecteurs.
Cette page peut inclure du contenu de tiers fourni à des fins d'information uniquement. Gate ne garantit ni l'exactitude ni la validité de ces contenus, n’endosse pas les opinions exprimées, et ne fournit aucun conseil financier ou professionnel à travers ces informations. Voir la section Avertissement pour plus de détails.
ETF Bitcoin ou Bitcoin Hyper | Bitcoinist.com
Meanwhile, another path emerges, more underground, more radical: that of Bitcoin Hyper, a project that diverts the codes of memecoins to offer an enhanced version of Bitcoin. Two options, two philosophies. Should we stay on the side of Bitcoin ETFs, or bet on the audacity of Bitcoin Hyper? That is the question we are asking today.
L’essor des ETF Bitcoin : simplicité et institutionnalisation
It only took eighteen months for Bitcoin ETFs to become the norm. Even in 2023, holding BTC involved managing a wallet, securing private keys, and tracking fluctuations in network fees. Today, everything is done through a securities account. In just a few clicks, any individual can buy shares backed by real Bitcoin, held by secure custodians.
This approach is appealing. It is simple, smooth, compatible with traditional tax frameworks, and allows cautious investors to expose themselves without getting their hands dirty. The gap between the ETF price and that of Bitcoin is often negligible. Volumes are significant, liquidity is present. On the surface, everything seems under control.
But this simplicity has a downside. The ETF is not Bitcoin. It is a derivative product, a substitute. It does not provide access to the ecosystem, does not allow participation in the network, nor interaction with the emerging innovations. By opting for the Bitcoin ETF, one agrees to be a spectator. See also: Altcoin season.
Bitcoin Hyper : une tentative de réappropriation technique et narrative
In the face of this wave of institutionalization, some resist. And it is in this context that Bitcoin Hyper is situated. This project, still in the successful presale phase (, shakes up the benchmarks. It presents itself as a Layer 2 for Bitcoin, designed to add a layer of speed, programmability, and connectivity. Except that it does so with an assumed insolence, at the crossroads of technical diversion and cultural satire.
Specifically, Bitcoin Hyper is based on the Solana Virtual Machine. This technological choice allows it to benefit from an ultra-fast infrastructure while building bridges with the Bitcoin ecosystem. The goal is clear: to inject DeFi, staking, and smart contracts into a historically closed universe.
But beyond engineering, it is the positioning that stands out. Bitcoin Hyper presents itself as a serious memecoin, or a mocking protocol. It plays with the codes, without ever falling into gratuitous absurdity. It diverts to better build. And perhaps this is its greatest strength: this ability to create adherence without giving up ambiguity.
) Participez à la prévente de Bitcoin Hyper !
Comparatif : deux stratégies d’investissement, deux natures d’actifs
Here is a comparison between these two opposing approaches:
| | | | | --- | --- | --- | | Critère | ETF Bitcoin ###IBIT, FBTC…( | Bitcoin Hyper )HYPER( | | Nature de l’actif | Produit financier adossé à du BTC | Token natif d’un Layer 2 encore en presale | | Accès | Compte-titres, interface traditionnelle | Wallet crypto, interaction on-chain | | Frais | Gestion annuelle | Aucun frais mais fort risque spéculatif | | Function | Passive exposure to BTC price | Active utility in an ecosystem | | Horizon | Long terme sécurisé | Court/moyen terme spéculatif | | Potential for gain | Aligned with BTC | Strong multiplier in case of success |
The contrast is clear. While the ETF offers you a fixed position, Bitcoin Hyper offers you participation. One seeks to protect you, the other to activate you. One follows, the other tries to create. It all depends on what you expect from your investment.
ETF Bitcoin pour qui ? Adapter son choix à son profil
We believe that this debate does not call for a single answer. The choice between Bitcoin ETF and Bitcoin Hyper primarily depends on your stance. If you are looking for stability, compliance, and long-term visibility, the ETF remains a coherent solution. It ticks the classic boxes for asset allocation: regulation, liquidity, tax clarity.
But if you are one of those who invest to experiment, to take chances, to capture asymmetry, then Bitcoin Hyper deserves your full attention. Because it is not just a speculative bet. It is also a narrative proposition. It involves you. It forces you to choose a side.
Some will combine the two. A solid base via ETF, and a bolder line on HYPER. Others will opt for a single horse. Whatever your decision, it will say a lot about your relationship with the market.
) ETF Bitcoin et Bitcoin HYPER : ni l’un ni l’autre n’est sans risque
We said it: Bitcoin ETFs are not neutral. Their dependence on centralized managers, their potential exposure to regulatory restrictions, and their total lack of interaction with the network are structural limits. They are easy, but they are silent.
As for Bitcoin Hyper, everything is to be built. The project relies on precise execution: finalization of the presale, launch of cross-chain bridges, maintaining the staking level, listings on exchanges… A delay or a flaw could jeopardize everything. Not to mention the liquidity risk at the time of launch.
C’est pourquoi nous insistons : parier sur Bitcoin Hyper, c’est accepter un haut niveau d’incertitude. Mais c’est aussi revendiquer une forme d’engagement. Celui de croire qu’une autre couche est possible. Qu’un Bitcoin plus vivant, plus interactif, plus narratif peut émerger.
Comment choisir entre ETF Bitcoin et Bitcoin Hyper ?
Nous pensons que Bitcoin Hyper est plus qu’un simple token en presale. C’est une tentative, peut-être maladroite, peut-être brillante, de répondre à l’institutionnalisation croissante de Bitcoin. Là où les ETF canalisent, $HYPER déborde. Là où les ETF filtrent, HYPER provoque.
Choosing between these two paths is choosing between observation and participation. Between comfort and boldness. It is not a technical opposition. It is a divergence of trajectory.
And in 2025, as the crypto market normalizes rapidly, this question, to participate or to delegate, becomes more central than ever. It's up to each person to answer it according to their beliefs.
![]###https://bitcoinist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/safe.png( Le processus éditorial de bitcoinist est axé sur la fourniture de contenu soigneusement recherché, précis et impartial. Nous maintenons des normes de sourcing strictes, et chaque page subit un examen diligent par notre équipe de meilleurs experts en technologie et d'éditeurs expérimentés. Ce processus garantit l'intégrité, la pertinence et la valeur de notre contenu pour nos lecteurs.